OPEXA
Case study · 2025

Rebuilding mill-to-finishing flow for 24% throughput lift.

Vertical mill operation had spinning, knitting, dyeing, and finishing under one roof — but each operated as a silo. We rebuilt the flow.

Rebuilding mill-to-finishing flow for 24% throughput lift.

+24%

Throughput lift

18%

WIP reduction

$22M

Annualized savings

37%

Lead-time reduction

Challenge

The starting condition.

Spinning, knitting, dyeing, and finishing operated as functional silos. Each was efficient locally; the value stream was 38% efficient end-to-end. Lead times on flagship programs were 11 days longer than competitor benchmarks.


Approach

What we did,
in order.

  1. 01

    End-to-end value stream mapping across four functions.

  2. 02

    Pull-based scheduling system between dyeing and finishing.

  3. 03

    Capacity rebalancing across three knitting halls.

  4. 04

    Daily integrated planning meeting structure across the four functions.

  5. 05

    Cross-functional KPI tree replacing functional silos.


Results

What was sustained,
at month twelve.

  • +24% end-to-end throughput lift
  • 18% WIP inventory reduction
  • $22M annualized savings, validated by client finance team
  • 37% lead-time reduction on flagship programs
  • Cross-functional planning structure now standard practice
Begin

Your operation,
your case study.

Engagements like this one start with a 45-minute conversation and a written brief — before either of us commits to anything.

No-obligation diagnostic conversation · Replies within 48 hrs